SouthViews No. 234, 18 February 2022
South Asia and the Need for Increased Tax Revenues from the Digitalized Economy
By Abdul Muheet Chowdhary
It is understandable why Pakistan and Sri Lanka, both members of the OECD Inclusive Framework, rejected the Two Pillar solution of the OECD on the taxation of the digitalized economy. Both Pillars would have deprived them of badly needed revenues, especially Pillar One. South Asian countries, amongst the poorest in the world and with high levels of external debt, must conduct a careful cost-benefit analysis if they are considering proceeding with Pillar One. Agreeing to this means foregoing unilateral measures on all companies, including those out-of-scope and losing vital policy space. Further, the agreement will have a long shelf-life and likely last for the next 30-40 years. Thus, all developing countries, including from South Asia, should be clear about what they are ‘getting into’.
Download the SouthViews:
This article was tagged: Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project (BEPS), Digital Economy, Digital Tax, Digital Taxation, Domestic Resource Mobilization, External Debt, Global Taxation, Inclusive Framework, International Tax Cooperation, International Taxation, Pillar One, Pillar Two, South Asia, Tax, Tax Cooperation, Tax Law, Tax Policy, Tax Reform, Taxation, Taxation in Developing Countries, Two Pillar Solution